Pedagogical Practices in Teaching General Science: Senior High School Teachers’ Experiences in Grade 11 Classrooms at San Guillermo Vocational and Industrial High School, Schools Division of Isabela

Authors

  • ALLJON NARIO NORTHEASTERN COLLEGE Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64358/sih.v2i3.122

Keywords:

teachers' experiences, phenomenology, science education

Abstract

General Science is a core subject in the Senior High School curriculum that develops learners' scientific literacy, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. Effective pedagogy is essential in promoting meaningful learning experiences and enabling learners to apply scientific concepts in real-life situations. This study explored the pedagogical practices and teaching experiences of Senior High School teachers in teaching General Science to Grade 11 learners at San Guillermo Vocational and Industrial High School, Schools Division of Isabela. A qualitative phenomenological research design was employed involving eight Senior High School General Science teachers selected through purposive sampling. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis and were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase thematic analysis. The findings revealed that teachers employed contextualized instruction, inquiry-based learning, collaborative learning, differentiated instruction, and reflective teaching practices to enhance learner engagement and conceptual understanding. Despite challenges related to learner diversity, limited instructional resources, and time constraints, teachers demonstrated adaptability and commitment to effective science instruction. The study highlights the importance of continuous professional development, adequate instructional support, and collaborative learning communities in strengthening General Science instruction. The findings may serve as a basis for improving science teaching practices, curriculum implementation, and teacher development programs in Senior High School.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.

Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 Curriculum Guide: Science (Grade 11 General Science). Department of Education, Philippines.

Hattie, J. (2023). Visible Learning: The Sequel. Routledge.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. OECD Publishing.

Piaget, J. (1972). The Psychology of the Child. Basic Books.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to Differentiate Instruction in Academically Diverse Classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.

UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in Education—A Tool on Whose Terms? UNESCO.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-08