Structured Reading Interventions in Key Stage 1: Teachers' Experiences in Fostering Reading Fluency and Comprehension in Kasibu East District,Schools Division of Nueva Vizcaya

Authors

  • ADELFA DULNUAN NORT EAST COLLEGE Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64358/sih.v2i3.143

Keywords:

structured reading interventions,reading fluency,reading comprehension,Key Stage 1, teachers' experiences,early literacy,phenomenology,qualitative reasearch

Abstract

Reading fluency and comprehension are fundamental literacy skills that serve as the foundation for learners' academic success and lifelong learning. In Key Stage 1, structured reading interventions provide systematic and targeted instructional support that enables beginning readers to develop decoding skills, reading accuracy, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. Teachers play a vital role in implementing these interventions by designing responsive instructional activities that address the diverse literacy needs of young learners. This study explored the experiences of Key Stage 1 teachers in implementing structured reading interventions to foster reading fluency and comprehension in Kasibu East District, Schools Division of Nueva Vizcaya. A qualitative phenomenological research design was employed involving ten Key Stage 1 teachers selected through purposive sampling. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis and were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase thematic analysis. The findings revealed that teachers utilized differentiated reading instruction, repeated reading, phonics-based activities, guided reading, and continuous learner assessment to strengthen literacy development. Despite challenges related to learner diversity, limited instructional resources, parental support, and instructional time, teachers demonstrated creativity, resilience, and reflective practice in implementing reading interventions. The study highlights the importance of teacher expertise, family engagement, contextualized reading materials, and continuous professional development in strengthening early literacy instruction. The findings provide valuable insights for teachers, school leaders, curriculum developers, and policymakers in improving reading intervention programs for beginning readers.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Department of Education. (2023). MATATAG Curriculum Guide for English and Reading Literacy. Department of Education, Philippines.

Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411

Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read. U.S. Government Printing Office.

Piaget, J. (1972). The Psychology of the Child. Basic Books.

Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of Early Literacy Research (Vol. 1, pp. 97–110). Guilford Press.

Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for Understanding: Toward a Research and Development Program in Reading Comprehension. RAND Corporation.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2020). Intensive reading interventions for students with reading difficulties: Current research and future directions. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S153–S166. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.309

Downloads

Published

2026-08-08