Navigating Multiple Teaching Responsibilities: Lived Experiences of an Elementary Teacher in Promoting Holistic Learning at Dianed Elementary School, Dipaculao, Aurora

Authors

  • Rosemarie Anne Aspillaga Northeastern College, Santiago City Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64358/sih.v2i3.153

Keywords:

holistic learning, elementary education, multidisciplinary teaching, teacher experiences, phenomenology, learner-centered pedagogy, instructional planning, professional development

Abstract

Elementary school teachers who handle multiple learning areas perform a vital role in ensuring that learners receive comprehensive, balanced, and meaningful educational experiences. In Philippine public elementary schools, teachers frequently assume responsibility for teaching several subjects simultaneously, requiring them to integrate diverse pedagogical approaches while addressing learners' cognitive, affective, psychomotor, social, and moral development. Despite the significance of multidisciplinary teaching, limited qualitative studies have explored how elementary teachers navigate multiple instructional responsibilities to promote holistic learning, particularly in geographically challenged rural schools. This transcendental phenomenological study explored the lived experiences of an elementary teacher in promoting holistic learning while teaching multiple learning areas at Dianed Elementary School, Dipaculao, Aurora. Guided by Creswell and Poth's qualitative inquiry framework and Moustakas' transcendental phenomenology, the study utilized in-depth semi-structured interviews and analyzed the data using Colaizzi's Seven-Step Phenomenological Method. Five essential themes emerged from the participants' narratives: (1) Integrating Multiple Learning Areas through Purposeful Instructional Planning; (2) Fostering Holistic Learner Development through Learner-Centered Pedagogy; (3) Balancing Diverse Instructional Responsibilities through Adaptive Classroom Management; (4) Overcoming Instructional Challenges through Creativity and Resourcefulness; and (5) Sustaining Teaching Excellence through Reflective Professional Growth. The findings reveal that effective multidisciplinary teaching extends beyond content delivery by integrating academic instruction with character formation, critical thinking, collaboration, and lifelong learning. The study proposes the Holistic Elementary Teaching Framework (HETF) to strengthen instructional integration, teacher resilience, professional competence, and holistic learner development in elementary education.

References

ASCD. (2020). The whole child approach to education. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. https://www.ascd.org

Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140.

Department of Education. (2023). The MATATAG Curriculum: Strengthening basic education for the future. Department of Education, Philippines.

Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. L. (2020). Integrated curriculum as an effective way to teach 21st-century capabilities. ASCD.

Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Gu, Q., & Day, C. (2022). Teachers' resilience and commitment in changing educational contexts. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 28(3), 257–274.

Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel. Routledge.

Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Kounin, J. S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Larrivee, B. (2008). Development of a tool to assess teachers' level of reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 9(3), 341–360.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Marzano, R. J. (2017). The new art and science of teaching. Solution Tree Press.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.

OECD. (2020). Education at a glance 2020: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.

UNESCO. (2022). Global education monitoring report 2022: Non-state actors in education. UNESCO Publishing.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-08