TEACHING STRATEGIES IN ENHANCING READING COMPREHENSION AMONG MULTIGRADE LEARNERS

Authors

  • Mia Kim Crisologo DepEd, Naguilian Norte Elementary School, Calanasan Apayao, CAR, Philippines Master of Arts in Education major in Educational Management Cagayan State University-Sanchez Mira campus Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64358/4e05gb13

Keywords:

FLAT, reading test, multigrade learners, reading comprehension, reading performance

Abstract

This study generally examined the teaching strategies employed to enhance reading comprehension among multigrade learners in select elementary schools in the Municipality of Calanasan, Apayao. Specifically, the study determined the teachers’ profile, the strategies they used to teach reading, the learners’ reading performance based on their Functional Literacy Assessment Tool (FLAT) exam results, and the relationship of the variables in the study.  A total of 105 Grades 1 to 6 learners and 30 multigrade teachers drawn from ten schools across the municipality that participated in the study.  Quantitative descriptive-correlational research design was employed. Data were collected through validated researcher-made questionnaires and official FLAT records were used, ensuring ethical and accurate data handling. Descriptive statistics as well as inferential statistics, particularly Pearson’s Chi-square test, were used to test the relationship of the variables under study.  Findings revealed that across all schools, teachers consistently applied a variety of research-backed reading strategies, all of which received mean ratings indicating they were “Always” used in class, with guided reading ranking highest. However, despite the strong implementation of these strategies, learners’ reading performance remained varied. The correlation analysis showed no significant relationship between the teachers’ profiles and the teaching strategies they used. Likewise, no significant association was found between the strategies employed and learners’ FLAT results, suggesting that reading comprehension is shaped by multiple external and contextual factors beyond instructional method alone.

 

References

Araujo, M. C., Carneiro, P., Cruz-Aguayo, Y., & Schady, N. (2016). Teacher quality and learning outcomes in kindergarten. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(3), 1415–1453. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw016

Barrett-Tatum, J. (2018). Framing a social justice lens on literacy instruction: Preparing teachers for diverse classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 71(5), 539–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1653

Bernardo, A. B. (2020). Cognitive and linguistic influences on reading comprehension in multilingual settings: Implications for literacy instruction. Philippine Journal of Education, 95(2), 45-67.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Cheung, W. M., Tse, S. K., Lam, J. W. I., & Loh, E. K. Y. (2016). Multilingual learners’ reading comprehension difficulties: The role of linguistic factors. Journal of Literacy Research, 48(3), 285-309. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jlr.2016

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report

Department of Education. (2018). Phil-IRI Manual of Administration (Revised 2018). Bureau of Learning Delivery, Teaching and Learning Division. https://www.deped.gov.ph

Department of Education. (2020). Reading Performance and Early Literacy Assessment Guidelines: Filipino Learners Achievement Test (FLAT). Bureau of Education Assessment. https://www.deped.gov.ph

Du Plessis, A., & Conley, L. (2021). The role of teacher adaptability in the success of multigrade teaching in rural schools. South African Journal of Education, 41(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v41n3a1865

Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Hattie, J. (2016). Visible learning for literacy, Grades K–12: Implementing the practices that work best to accelerate student learning. Corwin Press.

Lonigan, C. J., & Burgess, S. R. (2017). The development of emergent literacy skills and their predictive validity for reading achievement in kindergarten and first grade. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 259–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9351-9

Piaget, J. (1964). Development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176-186.

SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. (2020). IBM Corp.

Trinidad, J. E. (2021). Understanding reading difficulties among Filipino learners: A rural school perspective. Philippine Educational Review, 113(1), 25-42.

Tupas, R. (2019). The role of multilingualism in reading comprehension development: Insights from Philippine classrooms. Language and Literacy Journal, 21(2), 67-85.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (n.d.). Sustainable Development Goal 4: Quality Education. https://www.unesco.org

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Westwood, P. (2020). Commonsense methods for children with special educational needs (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035971

Downloads

Published

2025-08-08