Effectiveness of the Concrete- Representational- Abstract (CRA) Strategy in Improving the Basic Numeracy Skills of Learners with Learning Disability

Authors

  • Rizalina Saturno Mrs Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64358/sih.v1i4.29

Keywords:

Concrete- Representational- Abstract (CRA) Strategy, Mathematics Intervention, learning disability

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of the Concrete- Representational- Abstract (CRA) strategy in improving the basic numeracy skills of learners with learning disabilities. Specifically, it aimed to determine learners' numeracy performance before and after the implementation of the CRA strategy, focusing on number sense, basic operations, and problem-solving skills. A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest research design was employed to measure the impact of the intervention. The participants consisted of identified learners with learning disabilities who demonstrated difficulties in basic numeracy. Purposive sampling was used to ensure that the intervention addressed learners with documented numeracy challenges. Data were gathered using a researcher-developed numeracy assessment administered before and after the CRA-based instruction. The intervention involved  systematic instruction progressing from the use of concrete manipulatives, to visual and pictorial representations, and finally to abstract mathematical symbols.

The results revealed a significant improvement in learners' overall numeracy performance after the implementation of the CRA strategy. Notable gains were observed in number sense and basic operations, indicating that learners developed a clearer conceptual understanding of mathematical relationships and procedures. Improvements were also evident in problem-solving skills, suggesting increased ability to apply mathematical knowledge to practical tasks. These findings affirm that CRA effectively bridges conceptual understanding and procedural fluency for learners with learning disabilities. The study concludes that the CRA strategy is a research-based and inclusive instructional approach that supports meaningful numeracy development. It recommends the sustained and systematic use of CRA in numeracy  instruction, supported by adequate instructional resources, teacher training and continuous progress monitoring to maximize learning outcomes for learners with learning disabilities.

References

Al‐salahat, M. M. (2022). The effect of the concrete–representational–abstract (CRA) instructional strategy on mathematical problem solving among students with learning difficulties. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies, 16(2), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.24200/jeps.vol16iss2pp321-336

Bouck, E. C. (2018). Concrete–representational–abstract approach for students with learning disabilities: An evidence-based practice synthesis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(4), 211–228.

Bouck, E. C., Park, J., & Nickell, B. (2017). Using the concrete–representational–abstract approach to support students with disabilities to solve change-making problems. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(3), 146–159.

Bouck, E. C., Park, J., & Nickell, B. (2017). Using the concrete–representational–abstract approach to teach coin counting to students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(3), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643416681159

Butler, F. M., Miller, S. P., Crehan, K., Babbitt, B., & Pierce, T. (2003). Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(2), 99–111.

Butler, F. M., Miller, S. P., Crehan, K., Babbitt, B., & Pierce, T. (2003). Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(2), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00066

Flores, M. M. (2010). Using the concrete–representational–abstract sequence to teach subtraction with regrouping to students at risk for failure. Remedial and Special Education, 31(3), 195–207.

Flores, M. M. (2010). Using the concrete–representational–abstract sequence to teach subtraction with regrouping to students at risk for failure. Remedial and Special Education, 31(3), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508327467

Kaya, D. (2023). Teaching addition and subtraction skills using the concrete–representational–abstract approach to a student with autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of Special Education, 38(1), 75–90.

Miller, S. P., & Mercer, C. D. (1997). Educational aspects of mathematics disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000105

Riccomini, P. J., & Witzel, B. S. (2010). Response to intervention in math. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(3), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991004200305

Witzel, B. S. (2005). Using CRA to teach algebra to students with math difficulties in inclusive settings. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(2), 114–121.

Witzel, B. S. (2005). Using CRA to teach algebra to students with math difficulties in inclusive settings. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(2), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00110.x

Witzel, B. S., Mercer, C. D., & Miller, S. P. (2003). Teaching algebra to students with learning difficulties: An investigation of an explicit instructional model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00068

Witzel, B. S., Riccomini, P. J., & Schneider, E. (2008). Implementing the concrete–representational–abstract sequence for secondary mathematics instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43(5), 270–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451208314730

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31