Teachers’ Instructional Practices and the Teaching–Learning Process: A Qualitative Study in General Science at Tejeros Convention Elementary School

Authors

  • DENNIS LIGLIG DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64358/sih.v1i4.38

Keywords:

instructional practices, teaching-learning process, General Science, qualitative study, elementary education

Abstract

Teachers’ instructional practices play a pivotal role in shaping the quality of the teaching–learning process, particularly in foundational subjects such as General Science at the elementary level. This qualitative study explored the instructional practices employed by General Science teachers at Tejeros Convention Elementary School and examined how these practices influence learners’ engagement, understanding, and classroom experiences. Using a qualitative case study design, data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis involving selected General Science teachers and learners. Thematic analysis revealed four major themes: (1) learner-centered instructional strategies, (2) contextualized and experiential science teaching, (3) classroom interaction and learner engagement, and (4) assessment practices supporting learning. Findings indicate that teachers’ use of interactive strategies, real-life contexts, and formative assessments significantly enhanced learners’ participation and conceptual understanding. However, challenges such as limited instructional materials and time constraints affected the consistent implementation of innovative practices. The study underscores the importance of reflective, learner-centered, and context-responsive instructional approaches in improving the teaching-learning process in elementary science education. Implications for teachers, school leaders, and curriculum planners are discussed.

References

Bernardo, A. B. I., Ganotice, F. A., & King, R. B. (2018). Motivation gap and achievement gap between public and private school students in the Philippines. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(5), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0391-2

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.

Bybee, R. W. (2015). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Creating teachable moments. National Science Teachers Association Press.

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31