Pedagogical Practices in the Teaching–Learning of Science: A Qualitative Study at Calabuanan National High School

Authors

  • Edgar Allan Nortez Northeastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64358/sih.v1i4.46

Keywords:

Pedagogical Practices

Abstract

Effective science instruction is central to the development of learners’ scientific literacy, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills (Bybee, 2013). Pedagogical practices employed by teachers play a crucial role in shaping learners’ engagement, conceptual understanding, and attitudes toward science (Hmelo-Silver et al., 2007). This qualitative study examined the pedagogical practices used in the teaching–learning of Science at Calabuanan National High School and explored how these practices influence learners’ classroom engagement and learning experiences. Using a qualitative descriptive research design, data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with science teachers and focus group discussions with junior high school learners. Thematic analysis revealed four major themes: learner-centered and inquiry-based practices, contextualization and real-world connections, assessment practices supporting learning, and challenges in implementing innovative pedagogy. Findings indicate that participatory and inquiry-oriented strategies enhance learner engagement and conceptual understanding, while contextualized instruction supports meaningful learning (Prince & Felder, 2006). However, constraints such as time limitations, large class sizes, and limited resources affect consistent implementation. The study concludes that science teaching is most effective when inquiry-based and contextually grounded approaches are supported by institutional resources and professional development.

References

Abana, A (2021). A Scrutiny of K-12 Strands and the Learning Program Vis-à-vis its Academic Performance. Psychology and Education Journal. 58 (2): 7977-7984

Andres, A. (2019). Achievement Goals and Mathematics Achievement of the Senior High School Students. International Journal of English and Education, 8 (2).

Andres, A. (2023). Establishing Quality Instrument for the Summative Assessment of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers. JETT. 14 (3), 9-16).

Andres, A.D. (2022). Metacognition and Performance in Mathematical Problem-Solving Among Bachelor of Elementary (BEED) Pre-service Teachers. Central European Management Journal, 30 (4). 86-95.

Antonio, A. (2021). Syntactical Scrutiny: Inaccuracies in the Lesson Planning of Non- Language Pre Service Teachers. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education,

Balog, P., & Gonzales, E. (2021). From Linguistic Landscapes to Teaching Resources: A Case of Some Rural Areas in the Province of Quezon. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 1(2), 23–44.

Banares, A. J. (2022). Reinterpreting Sonnet 18 by William Shakespeare through Stylistic Analysis. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 3(July Special Issue), 189–204. https://ijase.org/index.php/ijase/article/view/163.

Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2018). Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Horizon Research.

Batang, B., Villa, F., Natividad, A., Gonzales, A., Cabansag, J., & Bangayan, O. (2025). Culturally-Informed Leadership and Management Practices in Philippine State Universities and Colleges: Navigating Institutional Excellence through Localized Governance and Academic Culture. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 7(SI2), 751–770. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI2.243

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Bonoan, K. C., Bunagan, K. A., Calangi , A. D., Chan, E. P., Corpuz , L. P. ., Deseo, J. M. ., Suarez, R. H., Sumulong, B. I. ., & Flores, A. R. (2021). A Comparative Study on the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) on the Preventive Measures Against Covid-19 of the Residents in Rural (Lobo, Batangas) and Urban (Taguig City, Metro Manila) Areas in the Philippines . International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 1(3), 77–123. Retrieved from https://ijase.org/index.php/ijase/article/view/35

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Buncag, R. (2022). Parent-Assisted Modular Reading Program: Its Effect on Reading Performance During the Covid-19 Pandemic of Grade 5 Pupils of Biwag Elementary School, Tallag Cabagan Isabela. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 3(July Special Issue), 39–50. https://ijase.org/index.php/ijase/article/view/154

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Creating teachable moments. NSTA Press.

Caliboso, J., Bagalay, B., Santiago, M. Bayan, R., Aguinaldo, I., & Belo, J. (2025). Literary Texts as Cultural Tools: A Study on Contextualized Learning Strategies in Philippine Higher Education. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 7(SI2), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI2.205

Camiring-Picpican, H., Flores, K., Caban, R., Mohadali, S., Galdonez, D., & Alih, C. (2025). Pedagogical Innovations Based on Philippine Cultural Practices: A Framework for Culturally Responsive Teaching in Higher Education. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 7(SI2), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI2.168

Caranguian, C. B. (2022). Family-related Factors Influencing Success in the Licensure Examination for Teachers. International Journal of Educational Sciences. 38 (1-3), 62-69.

Caranguian, C. B. (2023). Level of Parental Involvement as a Predictor of Academic Achievement and School Adjustment. Universidad de Granada.14(3), 138-143.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume II): Policies and practices for successful schools. OECD Publishing.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Studies in Interdisciplinary Horizons

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Studies in Interdisciplinary Horizons

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Under this license, you may not use the material for any commercial purposes.

The images or other third-party material in this article are included under the Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.