Innovating the Teaching–Learning Process through Pedagogical and ICT-Supported Practices in Technology and Livelihood Education at Hungduan National High School

Authors

  • Roy Lunag Tuwali-Ifugao Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64358/sih.v2i1.74

Keywords:

Technology and Livelihood Education, pedagogy, ICT integration, teaching–learning process, qualitative case study, secondary education

Abstract

Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE) plays a crucial role in developing learners’ practical skills, employability, and readiness for the world of work. However, traditional instructional approaches often limit student engagement and fail to maximize the potential of digital tools in skills-based education. This study examined how pedagogical and ICT-supported practices innovated the teaching–learning process in TLE at Hungduan National High School, Ifugao. Using a qualitative case study design, data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with a TLE teacher who also serves as ICT coordinator, and document analysis of lesson plans and instructional materials. Thematic analysis revealed that learner-centered pedagogy, ICT-enabled demonstrations, blended instructional strategies, and contextualized skill-based tasks enhanced student engagement, participation, and learning continuity. Findings further indicate that the integration of ICT strengthened instructional efficiency, supported differentiated learning, and addressed contextual challenges in skills instruction. The study underscores the importance of pedagogical innovation and ICT integration in improving TLE teaching–learning processes and offers implications for teachers, school leaders, and curriculum planners in similar educational contexts.

 

References

Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society & Education, 7(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.515

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2017). Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory. Sage.

Schleicher, A. (2016). Teaching excellence through professional learning and policy reform. OECD Publishing.

Billett, S. (2011). Vocational education: Purposes, traditions and prospects. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1954-5

Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). Routledge.

Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2015). Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve schools. Jossey-Bass.

Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

OECD. (2020). Education in the digital age: Healthy and happy children. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1209166a-en

Schindler, L. A., Munoz, J. C., & Wang, L. (2017). Computers in education: A meta-analysis of technology use and student engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(25), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2018). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9597-7

UNESCO. (2016). Strategy for technical and vocational education and training (TVET) (2016–2021). UNESCO Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-23