Development of Contextualized Short-Story Based Reading Intervention Materials

Authors

  • Ladymar Caliputoc Apayao State College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64358/sih.v2i2.90

Keywords:

Keywords: reading intervention, short story-based material, reading proficiency, instructional material development, elementary literacy

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate a Contextualized Short Story-Based Reading Intervention Material for Grade 5 pupils at Balasi Elementary School to address declining reading proficiency, where most learners performed at frustration and instructional levels in the pre-test assessment. Using a developmental-descriptive research design under the Research and Development (R&D) approach, the study employed a modified ADDIE model focusing on analysis, design, and development phases. Six expert validators, composed of Grade 5 teachers and Master Teachers selected through purposive sampling, evaluated the material using a structured questionnaire adapted from the DepEd Learning Resource Management and Development System (LRMDS). Weighted mean was used to analyze the data. Findings identified major reading difficulties in word recognition, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. The developed material, which integrated contextualized short stories and comprehension-focused activities, obtained a weighted mean of 4.00 interpreted as Very Satisfactory. The study concluded that the material is highly valid, learner-centered, and effective in supporting reading proficiency development among elementary learners.

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy. Longman.

Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 curriculum guide in English. Department of Education.

Department of Education. (2017). Learning Resources Management and Development System (LRMDS) manual. Department of Education.

Department of Education. (2018). Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) manual. Department of Education.

Department of Education. (2020). Every Child A Reader Program (ECARP) framework. Department of Education.

Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S1–S17.

Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188.

Federe, L., Gomonid, J., Jose, M., & Genelza, G. (2023). Comprehension of Philippine fables among learners: Basis for reading intervention program. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 20, 45–58.

Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Hattie, J. (2016). Visible learning for literacy. Corwin Press.

Guthrie, J. T., Klauda, S. L., & Ho, A. N. (2017). Modeling relationships among reading instruction, motivation, engagement, and achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 9–26.

Jeni, R. (2020). Enhancing reading comprehension through short stories. Journal of English Education Studies, 5(1), 23–30.

Lutfia, R., Nanda, D., & Fitria, W. (2023). The effectiveness of short stories in improving students’ reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(2), 215–223.

Mara, J. (2024). Reading performance of Grade 2 pupils using varied instructional approaches. Asia-Pacific Education Review, 25(1), 67–79.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Mesmer, H. A. (2016). Text accessibility and the matching of readers and texts. Guilford Press.

Nation, I. S. P. (2019). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing (2nd ed.). Routledge.

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. NICHD.

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.

Pocaan, J., Bailon, R., & Pocaan, R. (2022). Reading interventions for left-behind learners in the Philippines: A differentiated approach. Journal of Educational Development and Practice, 12(3), 89–101.

Pratiwi, N., Putri, A., & Suhadi, S. (2020). The use of short stories to improve students’ reading skills and motivation. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 345–356.

RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation.

Rasinski, T. V. (2012). Why reading fluency should be hot. The Reading Teacher, 65(8), 516–522.

Rosemarie, P., Santos, L., Cruz, M., et al. (2023). Readability analysis of short stories used in language instruction. Journal of Literacy Education, 15(2), 78–92.

Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation.

Tabanera, M., & Barrios, A. (2024). Reading comprehension levels of Grade 4 learners prior to instructional material intervention. Philippine Journal of Education Studies, 18(1), 102–115.

Tomlinson, B. (2013). Developing materials for language teaching (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury.

Tomlinson, B. (2016). Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-15